Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀϺΠġÀ§»ý(ÇÐ)°ú ÇлýµéÀÇ ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎ

The factors to impact on the satisfaction of field practice among dental hygiene students

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ·á°ü¸®ÇÐȸÁö 2017³â 5±Ç 1È£ p.22 ~ 30
½É¼±ÁÖ, ¹éÇÏ¿µ, ¾öÁ¤¼±, Á¤ÇϾá, ÁöÇý¹Ì, Ȳ½Ã³», ÇÑÁöÇý,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
½É¼±ÁÖ ( Sim Seon-Ju ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
¹éÇÏ¿µ ( Baek Ha-Oung ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
¾öÁ¤¼± ( Um Jung-Sun ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
Á¤ÇϾá ( Jung Ha-Yan ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
ÁöÇý¹Ì ( Ji Hey-Mi ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
Ȳ½Ã³» ( Hwang Si-Nae ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú
ÇÑÁöÇý ( Han Ji-Hey ) - ¹é¼®´ëÇб³ Ä¡À§»ýÇаú

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â Ä¡À§»ý(ÇÐ)°ú ÇлýµéÀÇ ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿äÀÎÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ¿© ÇлýµéÀÇ ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ ÁõÁøÀ» À§ÇÑ ±âÃÊÀÚ·á·Î Á¦°øÇÏ°íÀÚ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀ¸·Î´Â º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀû°ú ³»¿ë ¹× ÃëÁö¸¦ ¹àÈ÷°í ¼³¹®³»¿ëÀ» ¼³¸íÇÑ ÈÄ ¿¬±¸ Âü¿©¿¡ µ¿ÀÇÇÑ Ä¡À§»ý(ÇÐ)°ú Çлý Áß ÀÓ»ó½Ç½ÀÀ» °æÇèÇÑ 3Çгâ, 4Çгâ Çлý 108¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î 2016³â 4¿ù 1ÀϺÎÅÍ 2016³â 4¿ù 7ÀϱîÁö ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¿¬±¸ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î´Â ÀϹÝÀûÀΠƯ¼º 5¹®Ç×, ½Ç½Àº´¿øÀÇ Æ¯¼º 4¹®Ç×, Àü°ø¸¸Á·µµ´Â 7¹®Ç×, º´¿øƯ¼º ¹× Àü°ø¸¸Á·µµ´Â 12¹®Ç× ÃÑ 26¹®Ç×À¸·Î ±¸¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç 5Á¡ ¸®Ä¿Æ® ôµµ¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù.

¿¬±¸°á°ú: º» ¿¬±¸´Â Ä¡À§»ý(ÇÐ)°ú ÇлýµéÀÇ Àü°ø¸¸Á·µµ¿Í ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµÀÇ °ü·Ã¼ºÀ» ÆľÇÇÏ°í ÇлýµéÀÇ Àü°ø¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ³ôÀ̱â À§ÇÑ ±³À°¹æ¹ýÀ» °èȹÇÔ¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ±âÃÊÀڷḦ Á¦°øÇÏ°íÀÚ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. ¿¬±¸´ë»óÀÚÀÇ ÀϹÝÀûÀΠƯ¼º°ú ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á· ¿©ºÎ´Â Çаú ³» ±³¼ö´Ôµé°úÀÇ ¼ÒÅë Á¤µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, ¼±ÈÄ¹è °£ÀÇ ¼ÒÅë Á¤µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, ±×¸®°í Çб³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀûÀÀ Á¤µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.05). 2. ½Ç½Àº´¿ø Ư¼º°ú ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ´Â ÇöÀå ÀÓ»ó½Ç½ÀÀÇ ÁÖ ´ç ½Ç½À½Ã°£ÀÌ ÀûÀýÇß´Ù°í ´ë´äÇÒ¼ö·Ï, ½Ç½À»ýµé°ú Á÷¿øµé°úÀÇ Ä£¹Ðµµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, ±×¸®°í ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½ÀÀÇ ÃÑ ½Ç½À ½Ã°£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.05). 3. Àü°ø°ú¸ñ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü½ÉÀÌ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, Çаú ½Ç½À½Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï, ±×¸®°í ±³°ú¸ñ Æí¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ôÀ»¼ö·Ï ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸¸Á·µµ°¡ ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù(p<0.01).

°á·Ð: Ä¡À§»ý(ÇÐ)°ú¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±³À°À» ÅëÇØ ÇлýµéÀÇ Àü°øÁö½Ä ½ÀµæÀÇ È¿À²¼ºÀ» ³ôÀÌ°í ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ȯ°æ¿¡ Àû¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ÇÏ¿© Àü°ø¸¸Á·µµ¿Í ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ¸¦ ¸ðµÎ ³ôÀÏ ¼ö Àִ ü°èÀûÀÎ Àü°ø±³°ú¸ñ Æí¼º°ú ±³À°¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» ¸ð»öÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.

Objective: The purpose is to study the factors to impact on the satisfaction of field practice among dental hygiene students and to provide the basic data for the quality improvement of the field practices for dental hygiene students.

Methods: A self-reported questionnaires were filled out by 108 dental hygiene students in C city. Questionnaires were composed with the general characteristics, satisfaction to major, and satisfaction to field clinical practice. The data was analyzed by chi-square statistics using SPSS 20.0 program.

Results: The higher satisfaction to communication with professor or seniors in department was associated with the higher satisfaction to field clinical practice (p<0.05). The higher satisfaction to field clinical practice hours per week was associated with the higher satisfaction to field clinical practice (p<0.05). The higher interest to major subjects and the satisfaction to the laboratory environment were associated with the higher satisfaction to field clinical practice (p<0.05).

Conclusions: The higher satisfaction to major was associated with the higher satisfaction to field clinical practice. Therefore, the systematic curriculum development is needed to improve the satisfaction with major and clinical practice.

Å°¿öµå

ÇöÀåÀÓ»ó½Ç½À ¸¸Á·µµ; Àü°ø ¸¸Á·µµ; Ä¡À§»ý
Satisfaction to major; Satisfaction to major; Dental hygiene

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸